Follow us on X
Follow us on Linkedin
Real-world-data enabled assessment
for health regulatory decision-making

New publication in the REALM library

Another publication in the REALM library. Emanuele Ratti from the University of Bristol, together with Federica Russo, wrote a publication titled: "Science and values: a two‑way direction".

The paper is published in the European Journal for Philosophy of Science with open access to everyone.

Abstract

In the science and values literature, scholars have shown how science is influenced and shaped by values, often in opposition to the ‘value free’ ideal of science. In this paper, we aim to contribute to the science and values literature by showing that the relation between science and values flows not only from values into scientific practice, but also from (allegedly neutral) science to values themselves. The extant literature in the ‘science and values’ field focuses by and large on reconstructing, post hoc, how values have influenced science; our reconstruction of the case studies, instead, aims to show that scientific concepts and methods too, because of specific identifiable characteristics, can promote some values rather than (or at the expense of) others. We explain this bidirectional relation in analogy to debates on the normativity of technical artifacts and on feminist approaches in science, and we illustrate our claims with cases from the health sciences and machine learning. While our arguments in this paper also draw on post hoc reconstructions, we intend to show where, in the science in the making, we should engage not only with the question whether a practice is value-laden, but also how specific conceptual and methodological choices can influence values down the road. All in all, these considerations expand the ways in which philosophers can contribute to more value-aware scientific practices.

The article is available at: https://research-information.bris.ac.uk/en/publications/science-and-values-a-two-way-direction